The DA Form 2166-9-1 is an official document used for the evaluation of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army, specifically for the rank of Sergeant. This form facilitates the assessment of an NCO's performance and potential, providing a structured format for feedback from both raters and senior raters. It includes sections for administrative data, duty descriptions, and performance evaluations, ensuring a comprehensive review process.
The DA 2166-9-1 form plays a crucial role in the evaluation of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the United States Army, specifically for the rank of Sergeant. This form is designed to assess an NCO's performance, professionalism, attributes, and competencies over a specified period. It includes essential administrative data such as the NCO's name, social security number, rank, unit, and reason for submission. The evaluation process involves multiple layers of authentication, requiring signatures from both the rater and the senior rater, along with their respective email addresses. The form also outlines the duty description, which provides a clear picture of the NCO's responsibilities and areas of special emphasis. Performance evaluation is a significant component, addressing various attributes like character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement. Each attribute is assessed with specific criteria, allowing for a comprehensive overview of the NCO's capabilities. Furthermore, the senior rater provides an overall potential rating, comparing the rated NCO to peers and identifying future assignment opportunities. The DA 2166-9-1 is not just a form; it is a vital tool for professional development and accountability within the Army, ensuring that NCOs are recognized for their contributions and guided in their career progression.
HQDA#:
Attachments Menu
NCO EVALUATION REPORT (SGT)
For use of this form, see AR 623-3 and DA PAM 623-3;; the proponent agency is DCS, G-1.
SEE PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
IN AR 623-3
PART I - ADMINISTRATIVE DATA
a.NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial)
b. SSN (or DOD ID No.)
c. RANK
d. DATE OF RANK
e. PMOSC
f. UNIT, ORG, STATION, ZIP CODE OR APO, MAJOR COMMAND
g. STATUS CODE
h. UIC
i. REASON FOR SUBMISSION
j. PERIOD COVERED
FROMTHRU
YEAR MONTH DAY
k.RATED MONTHS
l.NONRATED CODES
m. NO OF ENCLOSURES
n. RATED NCO'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)
PART II - AUTHENTICATION
a1. NAME OF RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial)
a2. SSN (or DOD ID No.)
a3. RATER'S SIGNATURE
a4. DATE (YYYYMMDD)
a5. RANK
PMOSC/BRANCH
ORGANIZATION
DUTY ASSIGNMENT
a6. RATER'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)
b1. NAME OF SENIOR RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial)
b2. SSN (or DOD ID No.)
b3. SENIOR RATER'S SIGNATURE
b4. DATE (YYYYMMDD)
b5. RANK
b6. SENIOR RATER'S EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or .mil)
c1. SUPPLEMENTARY
c2. NAME OF SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER
c3. RANK
PMOSC/
REVIEW REQUIRED?
(Last, First, Middle Initial)
BRANCH
YES
NO
c4. COMMENTS
c5. SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER'S SIGNATURE
c6. DATE(YYYYMMDD)
c7. SUPPLEMENTARY REVIEWER'S EMAIL ADDRESS
ENCLOSED?
(.gov or .mil)
RATED NCO: I understand my signature does not constitute agreement or disagreement with the assessments of the rater and senior rater. I further understand my signature verifies that the administrative data in Part I, the rating officials and counseling dates in Part II, the duty description in Part III, and the APFT and height/weight entries in Part IVa and IVb are correct. I have seen the completed report. I am aware of the appeals process of AR 623-3.
d1. COUNSELING DATES INITIAL
LATER
d2. RATED NCO'S SIGNATURE
d3. DATE (YYYYMMDD)
PART III - DUTY DESCRIPTION (Rater)
a. PRINCIPAL DUTY TITLE
b. DUTY MOSC
c.DAILY DUTIES AND SCOPE (To include, as appropriate, people, equipment, facilities, and dollars)
d.AREAS OF SPECIAL EMPHASIS
e.APPOINTED DUTIES
PART IV - PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, PROFESSIONALISM, ATTRIBUTES, AND COMPETENCIES (Rater)
a. APFT Pass/Fail/Profile:
Date:
b. Height:
Weight:
Within Standard?
(Comments required for "Failed" APFT, "No" APFT, or "Profile" when it precludes performance of duty, and "No" for Army Weight Standards.) Reset Item a. APFT/Pass/Fail/Profile
c.CHARACTER: (Include bullet comments addressing Rated NCO's performance as it relates to adherence to Army Values, Empathy, Warrior Ethos/Service Ethos, and Discipline. Fully supports SHARP, EO, and EEO.)
MET
DID NOT MEET
STANDARD
COMMENTS:
DA FORM 2166-9-1, NOV 2015
Page 1 of 2
APD LC v1.00ES
RATED NCO'S NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial)
SSN (or DOD ID No.)
THRU DATE
d. PRESENCE: (Military and professional
bearing, Fitness, Confidence, Resilience.)
e. INTELLECT: (Mental agility, Sound judgment, COMMENTS:
Innovation, Interpersonal tact, Expertise.)
f. LEADS: (Leads others, Builds trust, Extends COMMENTS:
influence beyond the chain of command, Leads by
example Communicates.)
g. DEVELOPS: (Creates a positive command/ COMMENTS:
workplace environment, Fosters esprit de corps,
Prepares self, Develops others, Stewards the
profession.)
h. ACHIEVES: (Gets results.)
RATER OVERALL PERFORMANCE
i. I currently rate
NCOs in this grade.
PART V - SENIOR RATER OVERALL POTENTIAL
a. Select one box representing Rated
b. COMMENTS:
NCO’s potential compared to others in the
same grade whom you have rated in your
career. I currently senior rate
MOST QUALIFIED
HIGHLY QUALIFIED
QUALIFIED
NOT QUALIFIED
c. List two successive assignments and one broadening assignment (3-5 years).
Successive Assignment:
1)
2)
Broadening Assignment:
Page 2 of 2
APD PE v1.00ES
The DA Form 2166-9-1 is an essential document used for evaluating the performance of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. This form is often accompanied by several other documents that provide additional context and support for the evaluation process. Below is a list of commonly used forms and documents that may be required alongside the DA Form 2166-9-1.
Each of these documents plays a vital role in the evaluation and development process within the Army. They help create a comprehensive view of a soldier's performance and potential, ensuring that evaluations are fair, accurate, and supportive of career growth.
Us Service Animals Esa Letter - It acknowledges the relationship between the individual and their support animal.
Roof Certification Form - The contractor declares no conflict of interest in the property transaction.
The Arizona University Application form is a vital resource for aspiring undergraduate students looking to enroll in schools like Arizona State University, Northern Arizona University, and the University of Arizona. It provides important details, including a request for a waiver of the application fee for Arizona residents experiencing financial difficulties. For comprehensive guidance on this form and to streamline the application process, students can visit https://azformsonline.com/arizona-university-application/, ensuring they meet all eligibility criteria and maximize their chances of admission.
Cg 2010 - This endorsement outlines conditions necessary for obtaining additional insured status.
When filling out and using the DA 2166-9-1 form, keep the following key takeaways in mind:
The DA 2166 9 1 form is an NCO Evaluation Report specifically designed for Sergeants (SGT). It serves as a tool to assess the performance and potential of non-commissioned officers in the Army. This evaluation helps in making decisions about promotions, assignments, and career development.
The form is typically completed by the rater, who is the immediate supervisor of the NCO being evaluated. The senior rater, who is usually one level above the rater, also plays a crucial role in the evaluation process. Both individuals must provide their signatures and necessary information to authenticate the report.
Part I of the form collects administrative data about the rated NCO. This includes:
Completing this section accurately is essential for proper identification and record-keeping.
Part IV focuses on evaluating the NCO's performance across several key areas, including character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement. Each area requires specific comments from the rater, detailing how the NCO meets or does not meet the established standards. This section is vital for providing a comprehensive view of the NCO's capabilities and contributions.
After the evaluation is completed, the rated NCO has the right to review the report. If there are disagreements with the assessment, the NCO can initiate an appeal as outlined in AR 623-3. This process allows NCOs to formally contest any part of their evaluation they believe to be inaccurate or unfair.
The rater is responsible for the initial evaluation and must provide detailed comments based on the NCO's performance. The senior rater reviews the rater's evaluation and provides an overall assessment of the NCO's potential compared to peers. Both individuals must ensure that the information is accurate and reflective of the NCO's performance.
The Duty Description section outlines the principal duties and responsibilities of the rated NCO. It includes:
This section provides context for the evaluation and helps clarify the NCO's role within their unit.
The "Overall Potential" section is completed by the senior rater and assesses the rated NCO's potential compared to others in the same grade. The senior rater selects a category such as "Most Qualified," "Highly Qualified," or "Not Qualified." This assessment can significantly influence the NCO's career trajectory.
Yes, the DA 2166 9 1 form contains sensitive personal information, including Social Security Numbers and evaluation details. It is important to handle this form with care and ensure that it is stored securely to protect the privacy of the individuals involved. Following the guidelines set forth in the Privacy Act is crucial.
Understanding the DA 2166 9 1 form is crucial for service members, yet several misconceptions persist. Here are four common misunderstandings:
This is not true. The DA 2166 9 1 form is used to assess both positive and negative performance. It aims to provide a comprehensive view of an NCO's capabilities, contributions, and areas for improvement.
Many believe that signing the form indicates agreement with the ratings. In reality, the signature only confirms that the administrative data is correct and that the NCO has seen the completed report. It does not imply acceptance of the evaluation's content.
This form plays a significant role in career progression. It influences promotion decisions and future assignments. A well-documented evaluation can enhance an NCO's prospects for advancement.
While the rater plays a key role, the senior rater and supplementary reviewers also contribute. Their insights help create a more balanced evaluation, ensuring a fair assessment of the NCO's performance.